Brought to you by Desert Diamond: http://ddcaz.com Attorneys from the U.S. Justice Department will again come before a federal appeals court to try to salvage President Donald Trump's order banning travel from six mostly Muslim nations, after a judge said it appeared to be discriminatory. The hearing gets underway at 9:30 a.m. in Seattle. It's the second time a three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will consider Trump's travel ban. In February, a different panel of judges from the court ruled against the president's first executive order, saying that the government had failed to make its case that a temporary freeze on the travel ban should be lifted. The judges also called into question presidential power to limit immigration the way Trump is trying to do.
Views: 8828 FOX 10 Phoenix
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 557360 CrashCourse
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Views: 8639 Shartsis Friese LLP
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
Views: 15016 TheLawChannel
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
Views: 20985 United States Courts
GoFundMe https://m.gofund.me/defending-our-constitutional-rights Patreon https://www.patreon.com/californiaguardian Paypal https://paypal.me/californiaguardian Help fight for your Constitutional protections. Activist and Photographer/Videographer JC Playford and his attorney challenge law enforcement credentialing of the press/media. Please support this channel and help me to continue to bring you videos while exercising my constitutional protected rights. Patreon https://www.patreon.com/californiaguardian Gofundme https://m.gofund.me/defending-our-constitutional-rights
Views: 18208 California Guardian
Views: 43577 The Battousai
GoFundMe https://m.gofund.me/defending-our-constitutional-rights Patreon https://www.patreon.com/californiaguardian Paypal https://paypal.me/californiaguardian Help fight for your Constitutional protections. First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.
Views: 110260 California Guardian
9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges testify on proposal to split the court. Mar. 16. 2017.
Views: 735 CHANNEL 90 seconds TV. Official Channel
Views: 59 Pound Sand
(NOTE - change "lower court" to "initial 3 judge panel on the 4th Circuit") - The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this week that the typical sporting rifles we all enjoy are "weapons of war", and therefore "too dangerous for the people of Maryland to own," AND THEREFORE NOT COVERED BY THE 2ND AMENDMENT!!!. Ya can't make this stuff up... Never let complete ignorance get in the way of a good decision, right?
Views: 372 Republinator
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
Views: 1354 Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit
This case was argued before an en banc panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on September 19th, 2013 in Courtroom One of the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, CA
Views: 22460 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a member of al-Qaeda and sent him to Syria, not Canada, the country of his citizenship. Mr. Arar's suit charges that his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated when he was confined without access to an attorney, both domestically and in Syria. He is seeking civil damages from a number of federal officials including former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Judge Sotomayor participated by remote video. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282779-1
Views: 27881 LawResourceOrg
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014. Note: to view the 28J letter requested by the court, and Rynearson's response to the letter, please click here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/240396489/28J-Letter-in-Rynearson-v-United-States-of-America-et-al For complete information on this lawsuit to include the complete video of the thirty-four minute detention and this encounter discussed on the Fox News Channel, please visit http://www.veteransagainstpoliceabuse.org/BorderPatrolAppeal.aspx
Views: 8774 VAPAadmin
In addition to Washington, 15 states and the District of Columbia have filed a supporting brief to argue the travel ban would “cause harm to the states, including to state institutions such as public universities, to the businesses that sustain our economies, and to our residents.” CGTN has the latest information.
Views: 1050 CGTN America
This video contains the first few moments of the U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit from June 8, 2017. The original video of the proceedings has been removed from YouTube by the user i.e., the Court, and replaced with an edited version. Why? Very simply because of the brief comments between two of the judges before the proceedings even began that this case was going to be an easy one. From the Hollywood Reporter, ""I think this one’s a lot easier," whispered 9th Circuit Judge Carlos T. Bea to his colleague Andrew D. Hurwitz, comparing the unlicensed family-friendly streaming dispute between Disney and VidAngel to previous items on their calendar while the attorneys were setting up for their oral arguments on Thursday.
Views: 345 Gary Graham
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
Views: 15495 LawResourceOrg
Brett Kavanaugh spoke as part of the Clinton School Speaker Series on October 24, 2007. Kavanaugh is a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. A former staff secretary in the Executive Office of President George W. Bush, Kavanaugh received his B.A. from Yale and his law degree from Yale Law School, where he served as notes editor of the Yale Law Journal. Prior to a clerkship for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, Kavanaugh earned a one-year fellowship in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States, Kenneth Starr.
Views: 500 Clinton School Speakers
Many federal judges have been touched by the Civil Rights Movement in their youth. Meet U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Roger L. Gregory who says that the struggle taught him that every challenge in his young life lifted him up and still helps him lift others along the way.
Views: 5033 United States Courts
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Top # 23 Facts
Views: 90 Srimalui Trivedi
CCK's Robert Chisholm and Zachary Stolz discuss United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. 1. What is the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims? 2.Can any veteran immediately appeal their denial to the Court? 3. The Court is not part of the VA. Is that important to the process? 4. What's the process at the Court? Can a veteran add new evidence? 5. How many cases does CCK represent at the Court each year? 6. Does a veteran need an attorney at the Court? 7. At the VA, the system is non-adversarial. What does this mean? 8. Is the Court system adversarial? 9. What does a win look like at the Court? 10. Does the process become non-adversarial again back at the Board? 11. Can one add evidence once the case goes back to the Board? 12. Does the Court ever award benefits or reverse a decision? 13. Does the Court make precedential decisions? 14. If the Court denies the appeal, is that the end of the road? 15. Does CCK handle cases in the Federal Circuit? Visit https://cck-law.com/news/video-the-court-of-appeals-for-veterans-claims/ for more information
Views: 959 Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick LTD
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (in case citations, 7th Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the courts in the following districts: This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video
Views: 173 Audiopedia
https://www.youtube.com/user/watsontw8. Watson & Associates, LLC are government contracts federal appeal lawyers that litigate disputes of government claims, contract terminations for default, contract disputes act claims and bid protests. As federal appeal lawyers, we also litigate appeals at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See https://theodorewatson.com/us-court-appeals-federal-circuit-appellate-lawyers/. Whether you’re a filing a bid protest or appealing the contracting officer’s final decision in a contract disputes act case to the Court of Federal Claims, our government contract attorneys can help. As federal appeal lawyers, we understand the various nuances that can arise when litigating at the Federal Claims Court. When the Court of Federal Claims issues a decision that is adverse, our federal appeal lawyers can file an appeal at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Whether you are appealing a COFC bid protest decision, small business decision or other government contracts appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, we can help. As federal appellate lawyers, we help government contractors to make sure that the standard of review for appealing Contract Disputes Act cases is met, that termination for default appellate cases also provide a clear view of the mistakes made at the lower court. As top appellate lawyers, our goal is to make sure that your present a strong appeals case on the merits and that the government contracts dispute is clearly articulated. https://theodorewatson.com/federal-government-appeals-appellate-lawyers-washington-dc/
Views: 58 Theodore Watson
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013.
Views: 7376 The Obama White House
14-10275 David Nosal appeals his conviction for conspiracy, computer fraud, and trade-secrets offenses.
In this Knowledge Seminar we examine U.S. Courts of Appeals. Learn about processes, court culture and landmark cases. Panelists include: Circuit Judge Roger Gregory, U.S. Court of Appeals-Fourth Circuit; Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, U.S. Court of Appeals-Ninth Circuit; Margaret "Peggy" Carter, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals-First Circuit; and Leeann Yufanyi, Deputy Chief, Court Services Office, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Recorded on March 31, 2016 in Washington, DC.
Views: 8562 United States Courts
May 08, 2017 C-SPAN News http://MOXNews.com The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, a case concerning President Trump’s revised travel ban executive order issued in March 2017. The court was considering an appeal of a Maryland U.S. District judge’s ruling blocking the president’s ban on issuing visas to citizens of six Muslim-majority countries. President Trump’s revision imposes a 90-day ban on travelers, but excludes Iraq from the list of countries and green card holders. It also applies only to those seeking new visas, not those with existing visas, and replaces an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria with a 120-day freeze. The first executive order issued in January 2017 temporarily barred U.S. entry for citizens of the Muslim-majority countries Iraq, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and Syria, and suspended the U.S. refugee program. MOX NEWS NEEDS YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE!! Paypal Donations https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=MHT8PM5BPSVC8 My Bitcoin Wallet Is: 18atzCBj9zt7HgMnSYajcpGJwq8BipDcta NEW! My Patreon Page: https://www.patreon.com/moxnews
Views: 2012 wwwMOXNEWScom
This video defines about the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in brief.
Views: 22 MP Legal Firm
General Mills Operation Inc , all the Appellees and their attorneys intentionally sent false document to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit DATED February 7, 2011alleging that Appellant Dupree had not file his Notice of appeal timely. Falsely stating Dupree filed his Notice of Appeal with the District Court on December 14, 2010-- fifty-four days after the Court's entry of final judgment. However, the "TRUTH" be told Dupree filed his Notice of appeal December 13,2010 the same day the final judgment was received. The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri clerk inform Plaintiff Robert C. Dupree that it will be after December 6, 2010 before hearing from the District Court. However, this is the kind of Fraudulent, Deceptive, and Manipulative underhanded Criminal Scheme that General Mills, and all the other Appellees had been doing for well over the past ten years in Conspiracy against Civil and Constitutional Rights of Appellant Robert C. Dupree Plaintiff Pro se. This Fraudulent underhanded scheme also clearly shows that the Settlement of full release was accomplished by fraud and deceit September 25, 2001, and many other false fraudulent acts of conspiracy against Civil Rights. the world MUST KNOW! However, now General Mills here in 2011 is being "Boycott" for their Practice of Deception, intentionally Deceiving, Manipulating, and lying to the Public and their Consumers concerning blue berries not been in certain food products. See WWW.FOODINVESTIGATIONS.COM
Views: 584 ROBERTDUPREE2
Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ronald M. Gould, of Seattle, does not let multiple sclerosis dampen his passion for justice. He focuses on strengths that transcend his wheelchair confinement and he gives others the opportunity to move beyond their limits. As Judge Gould puts it: "If somebody is enthusiastic about what they want to accomplish -- if they have a passion for it -- they have a chance of achieving it."
Views: 12288 United States Courts
Current Assistant U.S. Attorney for North Dakota and nominee to serve as a judge on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Jennifer Puhl testifies in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on Judiciary hearing on her nomination on June 21, 2016.
Views: 226 SenatorHeidiHeitkamp
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts: This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video
Views: 219 Audiopedia
After you have filed your appeal at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, you can still follow your case. After the court receives your notice of appeal, the court will create a docket card online (https://efiling.uscourts.cavc.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSearch.jsp). You can always go to the docket card online to see the status of your appeal. The Court will issue a "notice of docket" instructing the VA to file a copy of the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) decision and to send to you a copy of your VA claims file. The VA has 60 days to respond to the "notice of docket." This is a period of time when nothing will happen in your case. While the BVA decision is often provided quickly, it may take a full 60 days for the VA to provide your VA claims file and mail it to you. The copy of your VA claims file will be called the "record before the agency (RBA)." When you get the RBA, you have 14 days to go through it, and see if there are documents missing or documents that might be partially blurred. While your attorney will be able to assist you, you must review your VA claims file because you are the only one who has lived the life reflected in those papers. It's important to keep the RBA papers in order, because they are numbered. The RBA is the key to your case. You cannot add documents after the RBA is produced. Once the 14-day RBA period has passed, the court will give you and your attorney 60 days to file a brief. This provides the legal basis for what you think the court should do, and it will include the RBA documents that you and your attorney feel are helpful and support your case. It should be noted that even if you do not have an attorney, an informal brief can be filed by a veteran without legal representation, and your case can still go forward. After the brief is filed, the VA gets 60 days to write its brief, which presents the VA position on your case and why it was denied. If necessary, you will get 14 days to respond to the VA's brief. Then the central legal staff of the Court will prepare a compilation of all of the briefs and the documents referred to in those briefs, called the Record of Proceedings. The Record of Proceedings is given to the judge. Then the case is considered to be "in chambers." The case may be "in chambers" for a few weeks or up to a year. During this time period, you will again have to wait and there is nothing you can do to speed up your case. The Court could reverse the board decision, which is extremely rare. It's more likely the Court will remand the appeal, or affirm the board decision. If the case is remanded, it will be returned to the VA. This means the Court believes that the VA made a mistake and wants the VA to "do it right." A remand gives the veteran an opportunity to submit additional evidence. If the Court affirms the board decision, it means the case is over at the Court. You may still file an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, even with an affirmation of the board decision by the Court, if you want to do so. For more information, watch our other videos and learn more about how we represent veterans and their families for free at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims at www.vetsprobono.org.
Views: 7130 The Veterans Consortium Pro Bono Program
Subscribe to our page to see every lecture at CHQ this season! Visit our website at chq.org for more information about our lectures The associate justices of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2017 are the most diverse group in the court’s history, with five Catholics, three Jews and one of Catholic upbringing who now worships at an Episcopalian church. This changing dynamic of the justices is just one example of the changes in the Supreme Court over the last 60 years that Judge Jon O. Newman talked about in his lecture at 4 p.m. Wednesday in the Hall of Philosophy. For more information about this lecture, please visit http://chqdaily.com/2017/08/judge-jon-o-newman-discusses-internal-changes-supreme-court-since-1957/
Views: 1321 Chautauqua Institution
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
Views: 69824 NYLaborLawyer
Ever wondered what all the different courts in the U.S. justice system do? Wonder no longer. AJ+ breaks down the roles of the different courts and how they function within the wider justice system. Subscribe for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV3Nm3T-XAgVhKH9jT0ViRg?sub_confirmation=1 Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish Download the AJ+ app at http://www.ajplus.net/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajplus
Views: 60426 AJ+
USA v. Jordan Lamott **Check out my other channel for more trials & hearings** https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbiVe1u8cPp-3RlTxwoFSEQ/featured Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
Views: 567 LadyJustice2188
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law... Read More At: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/ Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern. Check out our website - and become a member - at: http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski Follow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski Like on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk Friends Of SecularTalk: http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason AMAZON LINK: (Bookmark this link to support the show for free!!!) http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20
Views: 12150 Secular Talk