HomeОбразованиеRelated VideosMore From: Indian Law School

Hindu Law: Hindu Succession Act 1956 (with 2005 amendments)

389 ratings | 78496 views
(in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) (in Hindi) CHAPTER II: INTESTATE SUCCESSION GENERAL S. 6. (amended 2005) Devolution of interest in coparcenary property.- (1) In a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, the daughter of a coparcener shall,- (a) be coparcener (by birth) same as son; Partition before 20th day of December, 2004, stand. partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908’. (3) Joint Hindu family property under Mitakshara law, shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, and not by survivorship. (a) the daughter is allotted the same share as is allotted to a son; (b) the share of the pre-deceased coparcenar, shall be allotted to his (her) surviving child (or grand-child); and (4) no court shall recognise pious obligation of son against debt of his father (or grandfather)t: 7. Devolution of interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba, kavaru or illom 8.General rules of succession in the case of males intestate succession: (a) Only to Class 1 heirs (if any); specified in schedule; (b) Else, if no alive class 1 heir, then relatives specified in class II (Schedule); (c) Else, if there is no heir of classes I or II, then upon the agnates of the deceased; and (d) lastly, if there is no agnate, then upon the cognates of the deceased. 9. Order of succession among Class of heirs: Those in class I shall take simultaneously and to the exclusion of all other heirs; Those in the first entry in class II shall be preferred to those in the second entry; those in the second entry shall be preferred to those in the third entry; and so on in succession. 10 Distribution of property among heirs in class I of the Schedule: Rule 1-The intestate’s widow, or if there are more widows than one, all the widows together, shall take one share. Rule 2-The surviving sons and daughters and the mother of the intestate shall each take one share. Rule 3-The heirs in the branch of each pre-deceased son or each pre-deceased daughter of the intestate shall take between them one share. Rule 4-The distribution of the share referred to in Rule 3- (i) widow and the surviving children get equal portions; same in branches of pre-deceased child (son or daughter). 11. Distribution of property among heirs in class II of the Schedule They share equally. 12. Order of succession among agnates and cognates Rule 1- Of two heirs, the one who has fewer or no degrees of ascent is preferred. Rule 2- Where the number of degrees of ascent is the same or none, that heir is preferred who has fewer or no degrees of descent. Rule 3- Where neither heirs is entitled to be preferred to the other under they share equally. 13. Computation of degrees (3) Every generation constitutes a degree either ascending or descending. 14. Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property any such property held by her as stridhana immediately before the commencement of this Act. 15. General rules of succession in the case of female Hindus (1) The property of a female Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the rules set out in section 16 : (a) firstly, upon the sons and daughters (including the children of any pre-deceased son or daughter) and the husband; (b) secondly, upon the heirs of the husband; (c) thirdly, upon the mother and father; (d) fourthly, upon the heirs of the father; and (e) lastly, upon the heirs of the mother. (2) For property inherited by a female Hindu (a) from her father or mother shall devolve, in the absence of any son or daughter of the deceased; upon the heirs of the father; and (b) any property inherited by a female Hindu from her husband or from her father-in-law shall devolve, in the absence of any son or daughter of the deceased; upon the heirs of the husband. 16. Order of succession and manner of distribution among heirs of a female Hindu Rule 1- those in one entry shall be preferred to those in any succeeding entry and those including in the same entry shall take simultaneously. Rule 2- the children of predeceased child of intestate shall take between them the share which such child would have taken if living at the intestate’s death. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO SUCCESSION 19. Mode of succession of two or more heirs If two or more heirs succeed together to the property of an intestate, they shall take the property- (a) save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, per capita and not per stripes; 20. Right of child in womb 25. Murderer disqualified 26. Convert’s descendants disqualified 28. Disease, defect, etc. not to disqualify ESCHEAT 29. Failure of heirs Chapter III: TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION 30. Testamentary succession 2. Any Hindu may dispose of by will or other testamentary disposition any property, which is capable of being so disposed of by him or her. THE SCHEDULE HEIRS IN CLASS I AND CLASS II
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (48)
Muthuswamy Ragunathan (13 days ago)
These idiots never make crystal clear act since advocates need to earn via court and case
Mayank Puri (16 days ago)
Chutiya video
Ramji M (17 days ago)
what is the intention to select this date 20-12-2004
AnshuL Negi (1 month ago)
Sale chodu confuse kr dia
A R K (1 month ago)
kya smjata h smj hi nhi ata kya bolta h
Prashant Kumar (1 month ago)
play at 0.75 and he sounds so drunk lmao, good revision tho. thanks
INDERJEET SINGH (1 month ago)
Kuch smjha b do Bhai..
PaRaS SoNi (5 months ago)
हिन्दू उत्तराधिकारी अधिनियम 1956 की धारा 23 क्या है इसमे क्या बताया गया है
Halder Travels (5 months ago)
Sir mera pitaji 1970 mai dead ho gaya.... Or pitaji koi will nahi banaya... Mera bahen ko property milega ya nahi?
Cyber Hacking (8 months ago)
section 6 ka subsection 2 batto
Tabla lovers (8 months ago)
Illegitimate ka kya matlb hai
Swaraj Kumar (9 months ago)
Reading karne aye h ki padhane bakwaas ...bak
Prachi6815 (10 months ago)
Can a daughter ask for her rights in her mother's ancestral property?(her father's side) because then it won't be an ancestral property right ?
Roshiba Angurana (1 month ago)
Prachi6815 no
Raman Singh (11 months ago)
Sorry to say but it seems you r in very much hurry. I don't understand Sir, are you teaching us or studying yourself. "Aage chalte hain" pehle jo dikh rha hai atleast us ko to odh lene do. Disappointed
Anil Kumar (11 months ago)
if there is no heirs of dying unmarried hindu female, then is there any laws for property distributions to cousin brothers
AVINASH RAMTEKE (1 year ago)
Thank you very much sir
Jyoti Sagar (1 year ago)
sir notional partition concept kya h ....pls discuss this
Jyoti Rana (1 year ago)
sir agar father nai will banai hoo ,,, and saaei property apne son kai naam ker di fir aise mai daughter ko kyaa apni property milegiii
Naveen Goyat (7 months ago)
Aghr father ki apne source sae achieve ki hui peroperty hae to wae kisi ko dae skte hae but family property h to sbhi ko milegi aghr father kisi ak person k naam krata h to baki usko court Mae challenge kr skte h
Jyoti Sagar (1 year ago)
Jyoti Rana no ....
ashok kolariya (1 year ago)
right now my elder fathers1234&family asking share in this property.should i give share pls advice me
ashok kolariya (1 year ago)
property registed on my father &elder father
mallareddy thota (11 months ago)
father and3brother parperty jeont distribusan and registration value
ashok kolariya (1 year ago)
im frm hindu family
ashok kolariya (1 year ago)
sir one small?my grand mother had 6son&2daughter
mritunjay kumar (1 year ago)
widow yadi again marriage kr leti hai to kya use pati ke assets me hissa milega?
Jyoti Sagar (1 year ago)
mritunjay kumar yes
mritunjay kumar (1 year ago)
pahle ke pati ki property me
Anchal Dogra (1 year ago)
lack of teaching skill bolna sikh lo phle
pravin nitb (1 year ago)
bakwass explanation😬
Veeranna Parma (1 year ago)
Sir, I have an agriculture land of four acres. The partition was done in my and my brother’s favor equally. But the partion was done during 1986 june with help of village accountant and tahasildar.I have a mutation papers .Since from 1987 I am getting holdings certificate to take the loan.But partition has not done throug registrar nor court deed.my father died during 1998 and mothe in feb 2005. Before june 1986 the agriculture land was on father’s name.before 1963 it was on the name of my grand fathe who divided the agri land in between my father and and my fathr’s elder brother equally. I have four married sisters asking share in the above land. Is there any time span to claim this land sir? I have heard that after gap of 13 years of oral partion, my sister were lost the claim in rights in ancestral property. Whether oral partition is acceptable or not acceptable to hindu succession act which was done before 2005 sep. Now my brother wanted to give the above land to me. Because he was not married but do not want to write the will.But i want to know after his death whether my sisters are having the rights in my brothers’s property or not? Kindly answer. With regards Veer parma
Veeranna Parma (1 year ago)
Sir, Whether oral partion done before 2005 through tahasildar is valid which was done without the consent of doughters during 1986.
Om Parkash (1 year ago)
Sir, I.          A,B,C & D  were holding coparceners  property (joint property) 1.                  A.  was having  wife but no children.Howevger she was not wedded wife of A but as a result of friendship 2.                  B.   was having wife and three sons and two daughters 3.                  C.  was also have wife  and three sons and two daughters 4.                  D,  was neither having wife nor any children.   II.            After the death of “D”  correction in the land record was made as under                 ¼  share was  given to  “A”  and 2/3rd to  “B” & “C”   III.           After the death of  “A”  correction  in the land record was made as under:                 Widow of  “A” was given 1/4th share in the joint property  and reaming 2/3rd to  “B” & “C”  III.           Widow of “A”  subsequently   wrote  a Will  allotting her 1/4th share of joint property                         in favour  of Sons   of “C” alienating  other coparceners.   Sir  my queries are as under:   1.    Whether the widow of  “A” was entitled to  1/4th share in joint property? 2.    Whether she was entitled to wrte a will in favour of sons of “C” above ignoring the interest of other coparceners.   I shall be grateful if necessary clarifications to my above queries  is given .                 Regards,                   Sincerely yours,                     OP Sharma
Rajendra Giri (1 year ago)
please clear married daughter right in father agriculture land in up land come in Nagar Nigam area and also developed by Meerut Vikas pradhikaran and alloted to public we are three sister and one brother Hindu succsation act sec 6 applicable in this matter or not Meerut Uttar Pradesh
plz will privillage will
Md Khurshid (1 year ago)
all explanation is good but please explain in detail and more
pupu Debasis (1 year ago)
Plz clear before death of father September 9th 2005 daughter married then what is laws
Simerjeet singh (1 year ago)
it is good video ... like it .. but matter should be more arranged for narration .. rest all is ok
narinder kamboj (1 year ago)
not a good video u seems to have lack of teaching skills
Naveen Chary (2 years ago)
Daughters cannot inherit ancestral property if father died before 2005, says SC. Does the above judgement is applicable through out the country?
pooja sharma (6 months ago)
Sir Hindi me bhi video upload kar diya kariye Jisse hindi medium ke bacho ko smjh aa jaye
Ramji M (9 months ago)
what is the differace section 6 and section 8
Veeranna Parma (1 year ago)
yes it is applicable throughout the country except J&K
R Shah (1 year ago)
I have same question. Someone pls Answer if you know.
Gaurav Yadav (3 years ago)
Very very confusing , you increased the hardness level of understanding for no reason.
Interesting but confusing. :(
Prakash Narayan (1 year ago)
Hindi TV - Mysteries and Everything

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.