HomeОбразованиеRelated VideosMore From: Kerala Freethinkers Forum - kftf

Property inheritance law in Islam (Malayalam) Nishad Muthuvattil


229 ratings | 27614 views
Programme organized byYukthivadi sangham Malappuram Municipal Private Bus Stand Hall on 09-01-2016 Why Should We Lift Muslim Personal Law in India? Muslim personal law is not completely based on Quran and Sunnah. But many Muslim thinks its just Quran. Its based on the book Mulla's Principles of mahomedan law by D.F.Mulla.(https://archive.org/details/principlesofmaho00mulluoft) This video is about property rights in Muslim personal law. Many sections are against women, some sections are against orphans, some sections are against widows and widowers. Explaining the demerits and suggesting solutions. About speaker: Nishad Muthuvttil. 21 years old. from vettichira in malappuram district. third year under graduate in electrical engineering at IIT https://www.facebook.com/nishadmuthuvattil
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (92)
Muhammad Ismail (1 month ago)
പെണ്ണ് ന് പ്കുതി അതിന് പറയുന്ന ത് കെട്ടി ച്ചു വിടൽ വിവാഹ തെ ധ നവ. മായി കുട്ടി കെ ട്ടി യ്ത ആ രാ മതം.. ഇനി തുല്യ മായി വീതി ച്ചാൽ അത് നിതി യാകുമോ.. 5. മകളിൽ വൈകല്യ.. സമ്പത് ത്തി ക മായി ബുദ്ധി മട്ട് ന്ന വർ 5.. മക്കളിൽ ഉയർ ന്നനിലയിൽ.. ഇ വർ ക് തുല്യമായി വിധി ച്ചാൽ നീതി യാകുമോ
Indian Kerala (1 month ago)
നല്ല മിടുക്കനായ ചെറുപ്പക്കാരൻ ഇവ ൻ ഭാവിയുടെ വാഗ്ദാനമാണ് അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ ..
Abdul Khader MT (2 months ago)
കുടുംബം എന്നതിലെ ഇടുങ്ങിയ ചിന്താഗതിയുള്ള ആളാണ്. പിതാവും മാതാവും മറ്റുമുള്ളവരുമായി യാതൊരു ബന്ധവുമില്ലേ?
Abdul Khader MT (2 months ago)
I am a CA. If you have any clarifications in inheritance law in Quran, please email me in abdul@abdulkhader.com. With just 3 sentences Quran explained all relations.
Abdul Khader MT (2 months ago)
സഹോദരാ താങ്കൾക്ക് ഖുർആനും കണക്കും നിയമവും മനസ്സിലായില്ല എന്നതുകൊണ്ട് ഖുർആനിൽ പറഞ്ഞ അനന്തരാവകാശ നിയമങ്ങൾ തെറ്റാണെന്നല്ല. മറ്റുള്ളവർ എഴുതിയതിൽ തെറ്റുണ്ടെങ്കിൽ അതിനർത്ഥം ഖുർആനിൽ തെറ്റുണ്ടെന്നാണോ?
ആശംസകൾ ഈ പ്രായത്തിൽ ഇത്ര അറിവും നിരീക്ഷണവും പക്വതയും ! Super👍👍👍 👌
Arjun v kartha (4 months ago)
ഒരൊറ്റ ഇന്ത്യ , ഒരൊറ്റ ജനത , ഒരൊറ്റ നിയമം
Muhammad Hashir (5 months ago)
https://youtu.be/bw33I61DNN0
Thomas Mohandas (5 months ago)
May I write these feelings? It was Vayalar Rama Varma who told us musically that it was Man who Created Religions and those Religions in turn created Gods and those Men, Religions and Gods in turn divided not only this earth and its Soil but also our minds. It is common sense what we need to understand that religions and God Almighties (If at all they are up there) have no relation between them!. A man or woman becomes part of a religion just because of the stupidity of his or her parents. A baby becomes a christian by undergoing a church ceremony within one month of his birth. He would never have heard of Bible or Jesus Christ and this applies to all religions and their followers. Let us hope that a truly civilized Government will ban this freedom of the parents and make it part of the constitution so that children will be taught love, kindness, politeness, compassion and good manners towards others and let them then decide which faith they should follow after they have acquired discretion or discrimination. The present system is nothing short of utter foolishness.
Anwar Sali (5 months ago)
Podaa copu
Noufal sm (5 months ago)
This law belongs to the believers in Muslim region , if the person like you is not digesting the facts mentioned in Quran for Muslims . Just leave it and get lost from the relegion who compelling to stay in Muslim relegion to explain all these . You can join Hindu religion 😜
aboobacker moidunny (5 months ago)
dear mr nishad, assalamu alaikum, kindly note that quran is a guidance for complete human race at large and prophet s a is a blessing for the entire nation, and muslims are those who obey the teachings of almighty. allah s t introduced inheritance law as a blessing for mankind, ladies are protected including their expenses by their fathers, brothers, husbands, sons, uncles and so on, what they get as per inheritance law is extra, grand children exempted from inheritance to get them more share as gift by legacy, if you closely observe quran, you will get answer of all your queries for sure, not only your queries, even the queries of the entire people including scientists, they can get clue for entire universe in respect of earth, sky, galaxy etc and all contents of the universe. so that kindly use your time and energy for revealing the miracles of quran and its teachings to have a world of peace, love and stability. please note everyone in this world is a muslim by one way or other, if a person working for the bread of his family, he is a muslim in that respect, if a person is truthful, he a muslim in that respect, if he respect elders, he is a muslim in that respect, like that one way or other everyone is muslim in this world at least by some aspects. may allah s t help us to enter in islam in every respect of life. may allah s t bless you and all of us, with love and best regards moidunny, a 65 year old man working in kuwait.
veno account (4 months ago)
why don't you revel the miracles please?
aboobacker moidunny (5 months ago)
dear mr. nishad, assalamu alaikum i heard yr presentation of muslim inheritance law, and please note my comments: first of all qur'an is a guidance for the entire population of the world and
Krishna Kumar (6 months ago)
https://youtu.be/tmTE_2NWdXI?t=812 Act of V of 1843 അല്ല ആക്റ്റ് 5 of 1843. അതായത് Indian Slavery Act
Shamil Iqbal (6 months ago)
hello my dear nishad ,ur own(freethinkers) ideas of inheritance have it's on pros and cons.But Allah, his opinion about life is final with no doubts. you just teased a person by saying that "people in Africa are stronger thus they can rule the world",but ur negotiation is so childish that men and women are two biological beings where the nature itself made many significant differences between them(sound ,sex ,look,mental power etc)so that changes have shown in their feelings,abilities,intelligence,ideas,spark,interest and so on. That is the reason why it is biased to show result in all curriculum when men and women participate together. For the argument why not chess is played by both genders together ? why there is man and woman dual badminton instead of 2 men in one team and 1 man , 1 woman in another team ? think about it !!!! The creator knows well about it. coming to conclusion we can see that in some field men and women are equal ,but some cases men dominate vise versa. according to whole Quran and hadith men and women are equal. According to Islam a bit dominant nature lies for woman because the women are protected under her men for her health, food ,shelter,dignity,beauty and life.In islam it is a strict duty for men to do so where it will be questioned in judgement day. But okay, according to ur views(freethinkers) there are many exceptional cases where you can see man play a fraud role in society with this islamic laws ..you have to understand one thing this sahriath(rules of inheritance) can be fluctuated decently if needed while distributing their wealth if authorised people(owner of wealth) allowed. And in islam this case is significant where there is peace and harmony.
Shamil Iqbal (6 months ago)
kashttam
Rafi Kuwait (7 months ago)
Allakku kanakk thettiyadalla. oru kanakkittu thannada..
Rahmathulla Areekkod (7 months ago)
Ha
abdulrasak pp (9 months ago)
Mone nee athikam chirikkenda !!!
Indian Kerala (1 month ago)
abdulrasak pp അതെന്താ കോ യാ ഓന് ചിരിക്കണേൽ അന്റെസമ്മതം വേണോ ... ഓൻ പറഞ്ഞ കാര്യല്ലാം സത്യല്ലേ ...
Mohammed Jasik (10 months ago)
ഒരു തമാശയായിട്ടാണ് കണ്ടു തുടങ്ങിയത് , പക്ഷെ വളരെ മനോഹരമായ അവതരണം , കാര്യങ്ങൾ വ്യക്തമായി അവതരിപ്പിച്ചു .
Namsheed Thennoor (11 months ago)
യുക്തിവാദം ഇസ്ലാമിക വാദത്തിന് മുന്പിൽ പൊളിഞ്ഞാടി...
Shafeeq Kp (3 months ago)
Namsheed Thennoor .. കാര്യം മനസ്സിലാക്കാതെ ആണ് നിങ്ങൾ ഇങ്ങനെ പറയുന്നത് .... ഇത് തന്നെ ആണ് വിശ്വാസിയുടെ പ്രശ്നവും
cpnsr 777 (5 months ago)
Namsheed Thennoor parayunath shariyalalo
Fidhahu M (1 year ago)
എന്ത് മോയന്താഡോ ഇയ്യയ്
aravind kp (1 year ago)
why you are not explaining the more responsibility of men in Holy Quran for taking more percentage. in Holy Quran it is clearly mentioned the heavy responsibility of a brother on sisters,so the percentage is high. But in modern society I don't think a bother take care on sisters. so your theory may be correct. The view Of Holy Quran is correct but most of Muslims care gain only not pain.
Alyn a (1 year ago)
dear muslims plz take only things which are logical and which has justice. its your property plz give equal rights to women....looks like some bastard had written these things in the quran God cant be illogical what is the proof that quran was not manipulated what is the proof that not even a word in the quran has been edited.
Alyn a (1 year ago)
well said Nishad " vrithi ketta niyamam aanu ee womens property rights" No justice at all why should a women take her maternal grandfathers property as zakath it should be her right. If there is no justice and logic then better not to follow such an injustice book.
Alyn a (1 year ago)
Hi Nishad can you please share your email Id.....I want clarifications regarding my case
Nishad Badarudeen (1 year ago)
Nishad very good
LMAO (1 year ago)
please provide subtitles in English for all the trending videos !!
well done
Vki (1 year ago)
sahodara than islamiga niyamangal padikum munb nalla nilak muslingalil ninn vyakthamai ket padikkanam pinne bhakthude kaaryam parayanda kaaranam sthreek avalude swath arkum veeedikkanillathad kond avalk bhakthi undavenda kaaryamilla avalk thrpthiyan pinne sahodara ninnekalum ethrayo valia thathwa njanigal e low thirichum marichum padichitan Islam madathil abhayam thediyad ad kond thannekalum bhuddi kuranjavark vendi thanendo arivllaima paraunnu enne thonunad
Vki (1 year ago)
Id eed mandanano kuranu shareeathum ariyatha Muslimo onn mindandirikku sahodara mandatharam vilich parayade anandaravagasam natugark kodukkanundo pinne kodukkendad aarkan engineyan enn krthyamai paranjitund pinned adimathwam adima mojanam Logan muzuvanum pande muslimairunnengil pinne adimathwaum mojanaum parayendadilla thanik our adima undairikke. than muslimagumbol thande adimak avagasham undennan madavotha Arda sahodaran ennal pidavinde swathan veedam vekkunna engil e Arda sahodarn oru pidav undairikkanam engilavan a pidavinde swath koodi kittum islamil three use poorna. samraksanam elkunnadum avalude swathil bharthavino makkalko avagasham kodukkunnilla ad kond magalk pagdiyayal ad avalude maathram swath an ennal aanmakkal avarude makkalk kodukkanam onn poda ariyatha ninak endariana
Hastek Hashim (1 year ago)
പടച്ച തമ്പുരാനെ പടച്ചവന്റെ കണക്കു ശരിയാക്കാന്‍ വെച്ച നിര്‍ദേശങ്ങള്‍ ചോദ്യം വന്നപ്പോ കണ്ഫ്യുഷന്‍ ആയി പോയി പോലും. ജബ്ബാര്‍ മാഷിന്‍റെ അവസാനത്തെ നിര്‍ദേശം വന്നതോടെ എല്ലാ വാദങ്ങളും അസ്ഥാനത്ത് ആയി പോയല്ലോ മോനെ ? " മരിച്ച ആള്‍ ചെയ്തിട്ടുള്ള വസ്വിയ്യത്തിനും കടമുണ്ടെങ്കില്‍ അതിനും ശേഷമാണ്‌ ഇതെല്ലാം" എന്ന് അവസാനം പറഞ്ഞിട്ടാണ് ഖുര്‍ആന്‍ എല്ലാ കണക്കുകളും പറഞ്ഞത്. മരിക്കുന്നതിനു മുമ്പ് ഒരാള്‍ക്ക്‌ അയാള്‍ക്ക്‌ ഇഷ്ട പെട്ട ആള്‍ക്ക് വീതിച്ചു നല്‍കിയാല്‍ പിന്നെ എന്താ മോനെ താങ്കളുടെ തിരുത്തല്‍ നിര്‍ദേശങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് പ്രസക്തി ? വസ്വിയ്യത്തിനെ നിരുല്‍സാഹപെടിത്തിയ ഖുര്‍ആന്‍ ആയത്ത് ഏതാ മോനെ ? ഇന്ത്യയിലെ മുസ്ലിം വെക്തി നിയമങ്ങളിലെ അബദ്ധങ്ങള്‍ എടുത്തു കാട്ടി ഇസ്ലാമിന്റെ നേരെ കൊഞ്ഞനം കുത്തി ചിരിക്കുന്ന താങ്കളോടും അത് കേട്ട് ചിരിച്ച എല്ലാ യുക്തി വാദികളോടും സഹതാപം മാത്രം.
Hastek Hashim (1 year ago)
താങ്കള്‍ പറഞ്ഞതു മകന്റെ മകന് കൊടുക്കുമ്പോള്‍ മകളുടെ മകന് കിട്ടുന്നില്ല എന്നത് കേള്‍ക്കുന്നവര്‍ക്ക് വിവേചനം ആണെന്ന് പെട്ടെന്ന് തോന്നും . എന്നാല്‍ മകളുടെ ഭര്‍ത്താവിന്റെ ഉപ്പയുടെ സ്വത്തില്‍ ആ കുട്ടിക്ക് അവകാശം ഉണ്ടാകുമ്പോള്‍ ആദ്യത്തെ കുട്ടിക്ക് അവകാശം ഇല്ലാതിരിക്കുന്നതും വിവേചനം അല്ലെ മാഷെ ? ഒരു ഭാഗം മാത്രം എടുത്തു ഇസ്ലാമിക അനന്തരാവകാശം പാടെ സ്ത്രീ വിരുദ്ധവും വിവേചനപരവും ആന്നെന്നു വരുത്തി തീര്‍ക്കുന്നവരേക്കാള്‍ വലിയ വിഡ്ഢി ആരുണ്ട്‌ ?
Davis Kwt (2 months ago)
Hastek Hashim മകളുടെ ഭർത്താവിന്റെ ഉപ്പാക്ക് സ്വത്തില്ലെങ്കിൽ എന്താ ചെയ്യും
ഇജ്ജ് മുത്തതാണ്
raoofh00 (1 year ago)
allahu suhruthinu nalla budhi kodukkatte.
adnan pengadan (1 year ago)
ഒരു പുരുഷന് രണ്ട് സ്ത്രീകളുടെ അവകാശം എന്ന് പറയുമ്പോൾ പെണ്മക്കളുടെ വിവാഹ ശേഷം ഭർത്താവിന്റെ വീട്ടിൽ ആകുന്നു ശേഷം ഈ മാതാപിതാക്കളുടെ സംരക്ഷണ ചുമതല വരുന്നത് ആണ്കുട്ടികൾക്കാണ് ആയതിനാൽ ആൺകുട്ടികൾക്ക് സ്വത്തിന്റെ 3ൽ 2 നൽകുന്നതിൽ എന്താണ് തെറ്റ് അതിൽ തന്നെ പെൺമക്കൾക്ക് 3ൽ 1 ഭാഗം നൽകുന്നു അങ്ങനെയാകുമ്പോൾ അല്ലാഹുവിന്റെ നിയമം എങ്ങനെയാണ് ചെങ്ങായി സ്ത്രീ വിരുദ്ധത ആകുന്നത് ഇന്ന് നിനക്ക് കയ്യടിക്കാൻ കുറേപേർ കാണും നാളെ നിന്റെ കൂട്ടിനു നിന്റെ സൽകർമങ്ങൾ മാത്രമേ കാണൂ കയ്യടിക്കാരൊന്നും ഉണ്ടാവൂല ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യുന്നത് ആരുടെ വാക്കുകളെയാണെന്നു ഓർക്കുക അല്ലാഹുവിനെ പഠിക്കുക അവനിലേക്ക്‌ മടങ്ങുക തീർച്ചയായും അവൻ കരുണയുള്ളവനും ഏറെ പൊറുക്കപ്പെടുന്നവനുമാണ്
Arjun v kartha (4 months ago)
adnan pengadan അന്തരാവകാശത്തിൽ മാത്രമല്ല സാക്ഷി പറയുന്നതിലും ഇങ്ങനെയാണ്
Book Of Nazeer (1 year ago)
മനോഹരം ലളിതം രസകരം .. നിഷാദ് അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ..
http://muslimpersonallaw.in/
Riyas Manu (1 year ago)
dinggaa
Razak P (2 years ago)
eda nee okke muslimai janichallo!!!
Anshad Basheer (2 years ago)
ഇവനാണ് കലക്ക വെള്ളത്തിൽ മീൻ പിടിക്കുന്നോൻ മുഹമ്മധിയാൻ ലോ തെറ്റാണു എന്ന് വരുതിതീര്ക്കാൻ ഉള്ള ശ്രമം തങ്ങൾക്കു ഒരല്പം പോലും യുക്തി ഇല്ലെ എന്ന് എനിക്ക് തോനിപ്പോകുന്നു തങ്ങളുടെയ അവതരണ ശൈലികൊണ്ട് ഞാൻ യുക്തി ആയിട്ടാണ് പറയുന്നത് എന്ന് വരുത്തി തീര്ക്കാൻ ഉള്ള ശ്രമം
Sindhu Sebastian (2 years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oVsjlq8afw
Abdul Samad (2 years ago)
The parents normally live depending on the children and death of the children will be a major issue for them. It is this reason they are given a good share 1/6th each for mother and father. There is no unfairness here . Please note, here Quran did not make a difference in the division (like double to father when compared to mother) because both are equally dependant. But in other cases the Quran gives a male person double than a female share because according to the Quran the primary responsibility to maintain the family is on the male person.
Abdul Samad (2 years ago)
It is wrong to say father and mother should not be given 1/6th each. You will never bring a fair alternative share for them. In the Quranice division there is no question of being unfair to the children, because ultimately the grand father and grand mother will have concern for the children of their deceased son or dauther, and also for their daughter in law... But the children may not show the same concern for their gradfather and grand mother and the daughter in law is more unlikely (considering the fact that there is possibility she might get married again)..
Abdul Samad (2 years ago)
There is a wrong understanding with regard to the share of the deceased son’s or deceased daughter’s children. Al-wald according to the correct Quranic term means the son or daughter (children) as well as the grandchildren. Al-mauluud means only the child who is direct (Reference Lataif-ul-lughat, A unique glossary of the Mathnawi of. Maulana Rumi). While giving the orders about inheritance, the Qur’an says: yuseekumul laahu fi aulaadikum: 4:11 aulaad is the plural of walad: therefore it means not only sons and daughters but also their sons and daughters. Therefore, if someone dies and the children of his deceased’s son or daughter will come under the category of walad and therefore, based on the fair justice, there is absolutely nothing wrong in distributing the share the deceased son (would have received if alive) among the grand children according to the Quran. The error is made due to the incorrect understanding the usage of walad in the Quran. Similarly, not just the living parents, in their absence, the grandparents too will inherit
Abdul Samad (2 years ago)
One confusion in the question and answer session with regard to verse "in case there are only daughters: more than two shall have two-thirds of what has been left behind as inheritance" is an exception to the words: "A male's share shall equal that of two females". If you closely observe, it shall be seen that the share of daughters in the verse are stated in the descending order. Now, just think, in the descending order to description, if Quran had mentioned the share of two girls separately, there could only have been two possible constructions for the particular sentence: • Two or more than two shall have two-thirds of what has been left...; or • More than two or two shall have two-thirds of what has been left... if the choice was made in favour of the first sentence, it would have spoiled the descending order of the description; while the second sentence would have meant non-idiomatic Arabic, just as the translation is un-idiomatic English. Thus, the Quran did not sacrifice the style and quality of its language but gave a logical sequence of its commandments where it had to suppress the words: "two or" in the said verse. Please note, this suppression has not created any confusion whatsoever. It is quite obvious that the referred verse implies that if a person dies leaving behind two or more daughters, his inheritance shall be distributed in all his daughters, whether they are two or more than two, in such a way that each girl gets an equal share of the two-thirds of the total inheritable property.
HARI T N (2 months ago)
Abdul Samad
ABDUL JALEEL (2 years ago)
ഇസ്ലാമില്‍ സ്ത്രീയെ സംബധിചിടത്തോളം കുടുംബം പോറ്റേണ്ട ബാധ്യത ഇല്ലാത്തത് കൊണ്ട് അനന്തരവകാശത്തില്‍ സ്ത്രീകളേക്കാള്‍ purushan സ്വത്തില്‍ മേല്‍ക്കോഴ്മ ഉണ്ട്,, ഇത് ഒരിക്കലും സ്ത്രീകളെ തരം താഴ് ത്തലല്ല മറിച്ച് സ്ത്രീകളേക്കാല്‍ പുരുഷന്‍ ഉത്തരവാദത്തിത്വം കൂടുതലായത് കൊണ്ടുള്ള ആനുകൂല്യങ്ങള്‍ ആണ്‍,, ഇസ്ലാമിക നിയമ പ്രകാരം സ്ത്രീകള്‍ക്ക് അവര്‍ ജോലി ഉണ്ടെങ്കില്‍ പോലും അതില്‍ നിന്ന് ഭര്‍ത്താവിനോ മക്കള്‍ക്കോ,, അതി ജീവനത്തിനുള്ള വക കൊടുകേണ്റ്റ യാതൊരു ബാധ്യതയുമില്ല എന്നാണ് എനിക്ക് തോന്നുന്നത്.. എന്നാല്‍ പുരുഷനെ സംബധിച്ചിടത്തോളം അവനിക്ക് അവന്‍റെ കുടുംബം പോറ്റല്‍ നിര്‍ബന്ധ കടമയാണ്‍,, പിന്നെ വേറൊരു രസകരമായ കാര്യം നമ്മുടെ നിഷാദ് പറഞ്ഞു,, അകന്ന കുടുംബത്തിലേക്ക് തന്‍റെ സ്വത്ത് പോകുമെന്ന് പേടിച്ച് സ്വന്തം ഭാര്യയുടെയും മക്കളുടെയും പേരിലേക്ക് സ്വത്ത് എഴുതിവച്ച് അള്ളാഹുവിനെ പറ്റിച്ചവര്‍,, ഇങ്ങനെ അള്ളാഹുവിനെ പറ്റിച്ചവന്‍റെ ഒരാളുടെ ഭാര്യ വേറൊരു പുരുഷനുമായി ബന്ധമുണ്ടാക്കുകയും സ്വന്തം ഭര്‍ത്താവിനെ വീട്ടില്‍ നിന്ന് ചവിട്ടി പുറത്താക്കുകയും ചെയ്ത സംഭവം,, അത് തള്ളയും മക്കളും കൂടു തന്തയ ചവിട്ടി പുറത്താക്കിയ സംഭവങ്ങളും പത്ര മാധ്യമങ്ങളിലൂടെ അറിയാ കഴിഞത് കൊണ്ട്,, അള്ളാഹുവിനെ പറ്റിക്കുന്നത് യുക്തി യുക്ത മല്ല മറിച്ച് മണ്ടത്തരമാണ്‍ എന്ന് ഏത് സാമാന്യ ബുദ്ധിയുള്ളവനും മനസ്സിലാവും,, ഈ ഭൂമിയില്‍ ജീവിക്കുന്നവന്‍റെ മൌലികമായ അവകാശം ഭക്ഷണം പാര്‍പ്പിടം വസ്ത്രം എന്നതാണ്‍ ഈ അവകാശം മുസ്ലിങ്ങളില്‍ ആര്‍ക്കെങ്കിലും നിഷേധിക്കുന്നുണ്ടോ എന്ന് യുക്തി വാദികള്‍ ഒരു പഠനം നടത്തണം.. മുസ്ലിംങ്ങളെ സംബധിചിടത്തോളം അള്ളാഹുവിനേ ആരാധിക്കുക ജീവിക്കാനുള്ള വക കണ്ടെത്തുക കുടുംബത്തേ സംരക്ഷിക്കുക എന്നത് മാത്രമാണ്‍ ലക്ഷ്യം,, ഇവിടെ യുള്ള കണ്ടെത്തലുകള്‍ അതികവും മന്ഷ്യന്‍റെ ആവശ്യങ്ങള്‍ പൂര്‍ത്തികരിക്കാനുള്ളതാണ്‍, അതായാത് അവാശ്യമാണ് കണ്ടെത്തിലെന്‍റെ മാതാവ്,, അതില്ലെങ്കില്‍ കണ്ടെത്തലുമില്ല
Majeed PP (2 years ago)
manja koottangal
Dennis (2 years ago)
Awesome speech..Your speech educate me without boring...
Shouf Thacharayil (2 years ago)
Mooochi praaathan
gsimim (1 year ago)
Good signature!
Hassainar Thaikkaden (2 years ago)
ചക്കരെ സൂപർ ...അടിപൊളി. ഇനിയും ഇനിയും നന്നാവട്ടെ എന്ന് ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്നു. you were at the point..specific, precise and clear. അവരുടെ പുസ്തകങ്ങളും പ്രമാണങ്ങളും എടുത്തു തുറന്നു വെച്ച് കൊണ്ട് തന്നെ അവരെ പൊളിചെഴുതിയത് എന്തുകൊണ്ടും നന്നായി. ഇത് കാണുന്ന ആരെയും ഒന്ന് ഇരുത്തി ചിന്തിപ്പിക്കുന്ന പ്രകടനമാണ് നിഷാദ് കാണിച്ചത്. അടിപൊളി. super. keep it up. ഇനിയും ഇനിയും ഇതുപോലത്തെ പരിപാടികൾ പ്രതീക്ഷിക്കുന്നു.
ashraf Pary (2 years ago)
very informative , eye opener
Dinesh karangatupatath (2 years ago)
very good....dear religious people pls think seriously...aware religious mistake
Noufal sm (2 years ago)
Dear Dinesh , Religious people already taught by scholars . Scholars means really dedicated for religious studies ,the entire life . What Nishad is presenting is only mullas view , whether it's acceptable or not that's another debate. We Muslims we don't have a single doubt regarding anything , he is trying to just making confusions. "Just only one thing is more than enough to understand the beauty of the religion , those who don't want to follow law of Islam quit from the religion no one is compelling 😀why the guys are more tensed about our law of inheritance.
അറിവ് ഇല്ലാത്തതു അറിയിച്ചതിനു നന്ദി
abdulrasak pp (9 months ago)
E MOHD. SALM E MOHD. SALM thankal paranhath correct ivane theere arivilla ennath thankalum sammadichu santhosham !@!
Kutty KP (2 years ago)
+Hassainar Thaikkaden peak of stupidity.
Hassainar Thaikkaden (2 years ago)
+E MOHD. SALM E MOHD. SALM ചൊറിയുന്നുണ്ട്‌ അല്ലെ.....നല്ലോണം മാന്തിക്കോ.
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
Nizar P (2 years ago)
getting his number will be nice
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+Nizar P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
Nizar P (2 years ago)
expect u as future of freethinker. done the job well
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+Nizar P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
mubu mubashir (2 years ago)
send to my email
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+mubu mubashir https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
mubu mubashir (2 years ago)
can i get nishad no
Jaseem Tm (2 years ago)
Quran is indeed right ,proof goes here. These are the 2 verses from Quran that he mentioned: 4:176 They request from you a [legal] ruling. Say, " Allah gives you a ruling concerning one having neither descendants nor ascendants [as heirs]." If a man dies, leaving no child but [only] a sister, she will have half of what he left. And he inherits from her if she [dies and] has no child. But if there are two sisters [or more], they will have two-thirds of what he left. If there are both brothers and sisters, the male will have the share of two females. Allah makes clear to you [His law], lest you go astray. And Allah is all knowing. 4:11 Allah instructs you concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of two females. But if there are [only] daughters, two or more, for them is two thirds of one's estate. And if there is only one, for her is half. And for one's parents, to each one of them is a sixth of his estate if he left children. But if he had no children and the parents [alone] inherit from him, then for his mother is one third. And if he had brothers [or sisters], for his mother is a sixth, after any bequest he [may have] made or debt. Your parents or your children - you know not which of them are nearest to you in benefit. [These shares are] an obligation [imposed] by Allah . Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise. In his oration he claims that division of estates in this fashion would sum up to get more than unity (7/6) for the instance when a descendant have one daughter and 2 sisters.Which is false and the math involved is shown: From the above verses it is clear that When a person die, his only daughter 'll have half of his estates. (4.11) But a person with no child 'll descend 2/3 rd of estates to his sisters. (4.176) And now in his "116 %" ("7/6" example) the person had one girl child and 2 sisters, which means daughter shall get 1/2 and the other half to nearest kins-here to the sisters. (Note that 2/3 to sisters' share only when no child for the descendant.) Hope it's clear. :) So don't mix up the verses to your own choice and make absurd answers.
lynn amber (9 months ago)
Tell me how is it fair for women . Is not Islam fair for all
Hassainar Thaikkaden (2 years ago)
+Jaseem Tm read quraan don't by-heart.
Hassainar Thaikkaden (2 years ago)
+Jaseem Tm this is 4:11{ يُوصِيكُمُ ٱللَّهُ فِيۤ أَوْلَٰدِكُمْ لِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ ٱلأُنْثَيَيْنِ فَإِن كُنَّ نِسَآءً فَوْقَ ٱثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُنَّ ثُلُثَا مَا تَرَكَ وَإِن كَانَتْ وَاحِدَةً فَلَهَا ٱلنِّصْفُ وَلأَبَوَيْهِ لِكُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِّنْهُمَا ٱلسُّدُسُ مِمَّا تَرَكَ إِن كَانَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ فَإِن لَّمْ يَكُنْ لَّهُ وَلَدٌ وَوَرِثَهُ أَبَوَاهُ فَلأُمِّهِ ٱلثُّلُثُ فَإِن كَانَ لَهُ إِخْوَةٌ فَلأُمِّهِ ٱلسُّدُسُ مِن بَعْدِ وَصِيَّةٍ يُوصِي بِهَآ أَوْ دَيْنٍ آبَآؤُكُمْ وَأَبناؤُكُمْ لاَ تَدْرُونَ أَيُّهُمْ أَقْرَبُ لَكُمْ نَفْعاً فَرِيضَةً مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيماً حَكِيماً } God charges you, He commands you, concerning, the matter of, your children, with what He will mention: to the male, of them, the equivalent of the portion, the lot, of two females, if there are two [women] with him, so that half the property is his, and the other half is theirs; if there is only one female with him, then she has a third, and he receives two thirds; if he is the only one, he takes it all; and if they, the offspring, be, only, women more than two, then for them two-thirds of what he, the deceased, leaves; likewise if they be two women, since in the case of two sisters, more deserving of such a share, God says, They shall receive two-thirds of what he leaves [Q. 4:176]; and since a female is entitled to a third with a male, she is all the more deserving [of the same share] with a female. It is said that fawq, ‘more than’, introduces a relative clause; it is also said to guard against the wrong impression that the greater the number [of females] the greater the portion [they are entitled to], since, it is [mistakenly] thought that the entitlement of two females to two-thirds derives from the fact that a female is entitled to one third when with a male; but if she, the daughter, be one (wāhidatan, is also read wāhidatun, making the kāna [construction] syntactically complete) then to her a half; and to his parents, the deceased’s, to each one of the two (li-kulli wāhidin minhumā, substitutes for the previous li-abawayhi, ‘to his parents’) the sixth of what he leaves, if he has a child, male or female: the point of the substitution is to show that they do not share the sixth [but receive one each]. [The term] ‘child’ (walad) also applies to a grandchild, and likewise ‘parent’ (abb) to a grandparent; but if he has no child, and his heirs are his parents, alone or along with a spouse, then to his mother (read li-ummihi; also read, in both places [here and further down], li-immihi in order to avoid the cumbersome transition from a damma [‘u’] to a kasra [‘I’]) a third, of the property, or what remains after the spouse, the rest being for the father; or, if he has siblings, two or more, males or females, to his mother a sixth, and the rest for the father, and nothing for the siblings. and this is 4:176 { يَسْتَفْتُونَكَ قُلِ ٱللَّهُ يُفْتِيكُمْ فِي ٱلْكَلاَلَةِ إِن ٱمْرُؤٌ هَلَكَ لَيْسَ لَهُ وَلَدٌ وَلَهُ أُخْتٌ فَلَهَا نِصْفُ مَا تَرَكَ وَهُوَ يَرِثُهَآ إِن لَّمْ يَكُنْ لَّهَآ وَلَدٌ فَإِن كَانَتَا ٱثْنَتَيْنِ فَلَهُمَا ٱلثُّلُثَانِ مِمَّا تَرَكَ وَإِن كَانُوۤاْ إِخْوَةً رِّجَالاً وَنِسَآءً فَلِلذَّكَرِ مِثْلُ حَظِّ ٱلأُنثَيَيْنِ يُبَيِّنُ ٱللَّهُ لَكُمْ أَن تَضِلُّواْ وَٱللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمٌ } They will ask you for a pronouncement, concerning indirect heirs. Say: ‘God pronounces to you concerning indirect heirs. If a man (in imru’un is in the nominative because of the verb [halaka, ‘perishes’] that explains it) perishes, dies, having no children, and no parent, and this is the one referred to as an indirect heir (kalāla), but he has a sister, from both parents or from one, hers is half of what he leaves, and he, a brother, similarly, is her heir, in all that she leaves, if she has no children: but if she has a son, then he [the maternal uncle] receives nothing, and if a daughter, then whatever is left after her share; if the brother and sister be from the same mother, then the one receives a sixth, as was stipulated at the beginning of the sūra [Q. 4:11]. If there be two sisters, or more — for this was revealed regarding Jābir [b. ‘Abd Allāh], who died and was survived by sisters —, theirs are two-thirds of what he, the brother, leaves; if there be, among the inheritors, siblings, men and women, then the male, among them, shall receive the equivalent of the portion of two females. God makes clear to you, the stipulations of your religion, lest you go astray; and God has knowledge of all things’, including [matters of] inheritance: it is reported by the two Shaykhs [Bukhārī and Muslim] that al-Barā’ [b. ‘Āzib] said that this was the last of the ‘duty’ verses to be revealed.
Hassainar Thaikkaden (2 years ago)
+Jaseem Tm how did you get to the conclusion of giving one half to the daughter and the other half to sisters? then from where did you got the ' only' in both the translations?
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+Jaseem Tm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
Jaseem Tm (2 years ago)
Quran is indeed right.The orator has cunningly manipulated the verses.Proof goes here..:) These are the 2 verses he mentioned from Quran: 4:176 They request from you a [legal] ruling. Say, " Allah gives you a ruling concerning one having neither descendants nor ascendants [as heirs]." If a man dies, leaving no child but [only] a sister, she will have half of what he left. And he inherits from her if she [dies and] has no child. But if there are two sisters [or more], they will have two-thirds of what he left. If there are both brothers and sisters, the male will have the share of two females. Allah makes clear to you [His law], lest you go astray. And Allah is all knowing. 4:11 Allah instructs you concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of two females. But if there are [only] daughters, two or more, for them is two thirds of one's estate. And if there is only one, for her is half. And for one's parents, to each one of them is a sixth of his estate if he left children. But if he had no children and the parents [alone] inherit from him, then for his mother is one third. And if he had brothers [or sisters], for his mother is a sixth, after any bequest he [may have] made or debt. Your parents or your children - you know not which of them are nearest to you in benefit. [These shares are] an obligation [imposed] by Allah . Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise. He states that when estates are divided as per this it comes that fractions sum up to get more than unity(7/6) which is totally absurd.And claims "man corrects God" From the above verses it is clear that When a person die, his only daughter 'll have half of his estates. (4.11) But a person with no child 'll descend 2/3 rd of estates to his sisters. (4.176) And now in your "116 %" the person had one girl child and 2 sisters, which means daughter shall get 1/2 and the other half to nearest kins-here to the sisters. (Note that 2/3 to sisters' share only when no child for the descendant.) Hope it's clear. :) So don't mix up the verses to your own choice and make absurd answers.
Rateesh Sukumaran (2 years ago)
What an eye opener!
sreeji pnr (2 years ago)
vibrant voice & confidence. simply great.
NOUFAL MANAYIL (2 years ago)
വളരെ നന്നായി അവതരിപ്പിച്ചു.
Abdulla Madiyan (2 years ago)
അവതരണം നന്നായിട്ടുണ്ട്. അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങൾ! പക്ഷേ, മുഹമ്മദൻ ലോയിലോ ശരീഅത്തിലോ ഇനി പരിഷ്കരണം ആവശ്യപ്പെടുന്നതിൽ വലിയ കാര്യമില്ല. ഏകീകൃത സിവിൽ നിയമത്തിൽ കുറഞ്ഞതൊന്നും നമുക്ക് സ്വീകാര്യമായിരിക്കരുത്.
abdulrasak pp (9 months ago)
Sindhu Sebastian 👍👍👍
Sindhu Sebastian (2 years ago)
+Abdulla Madiyan Njangade mammootty paranjathorkunnille, മാറ്റുവിൻ ചട്ടുകങ്ങളെ, illengil avar ningale marichidum. Podappa, oru budhijeevi.
Sindhu Sebastian (2 years ago)
+Abdulla Madiyan Mandanman londanil. Ningal kurachu vivaram illathavar vattam koodiyal ellam ayi. POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOy
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+Abdulla Madiyan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
Mahesh Udayabhanu (2 years ago)
midu midukkan..nalla avatharanam bale bhesh :) (y)
Fasal Rahman (2 years ago)
+Mahesh Udayabhanu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTE_2NWdXI
hindukannur (2 years ago)
Very informative. Good presentation

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.